|
|
 Elite Veteran
Joined: 12/19/2013
Posts: 695
    
Points: 1150
    Feedback Rating: 37 Location: Pickerington, OHBadges:
|  |
|
|
|
 Expert
Joined: 12/25/2013
Posts: 2334
    
Points: 3564
     Feedback Rating: 87 Badges:
| But, you can't copy and paste the good info... |
|
|
|
 Elite Guru
Joined: 5/4/2010
Posts: 20003
   
Points: 26148
        Feedback Rating: 230 Location: Upstate NYBadges:
| Agreed, there is nothing of value in "score-only" review like that to the reader. But until recently, the author (Kyle Stogez) used to post his scoring format along with some descriptive terms of his entire smoking experience that I thought was helpful. Maybe not formatted the traditional way that most people prefer, but perfectly acceptable IMO. Here's an example:
(KyleStogie.jpg)
Attachments ----------------
KyleStogie.jpg (28KB - 27 downloads)
|
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Joined: 12/19/2013
Posts: 695
    
Points: 1150
    Feedback Rating: 37 Location: Pickerington, OHBadges:
| Agreed |
|
|
|
 Expert
Joined: 3/22/2017
Posts: 1379
      
Points: 1789
       Feedback Rating: 22 Location: Raleigh, NCBadges:
| Numbers only.............about like smoking a "dollar stick".............Numbers and a little Description - well now - that's a mid range to " high end yard gar"............Numbers, Description and a Pic - now you are in Padron Country. |
|
|
|
 Elite Guru
Joined: 3/31/2012
Posts: 12641
     
Points: 17791
          Feedback Rating: 235 Location: Steeler NationBadges:
| While I agree using a straight ranking by numbers doesn't feed the masses. for the most part it is personal to the reviewer. What is an 8 to someone is an 9 to or 7 to another, where one tastes cedar another tastes leather.
I have generally tried to be more narrative with my reviews, especially the critiques. But even the Geek critique rating system puts too much weight on items like appearance and construction while the flavor profile only accounts for 1/3. far too small IMHO
I'm not sure any system is perfect. |
|
|
|
 Extreme Veteran
Joined: 4/7/2017
Posts: 540
 
Points: 1575
     Feedback Rating: 6 Location: Long Island, NYBadges:
| I usually use the following categories and values, along with a description in each:
Appearance: 15
Smoking Characteristics: 25
Taste: 25
Overall: 35
I may tweak this though, going back through my notes I find there are too many times when a cigar burns great and looks great but tastes like cardboard, but it ends up too close in score to say a Padron which is ugly as sin but tastes very good. |
|
|
|
 Extreme Veteran
Joined: 4/7/2017
Posts: 540
 
Points: 1575
     Feedback Rating: 6 Location: Long Island, NYBadges:
| Maybe I'll do:
Appearance: 10
Smoking Characteristics: 20
Taste: 35
Overall: 35 |
|
|
|
Member
Joined: 7/15/2018
Posts: 25

Points: 30
 Feedback Rating: 0
| So I realize I'm a new guy on the block here but these points only reviews are basically worthless to a newbie looking to try new cigars.
My 2 cents is that is your going to review you should put at least some effort into it. I see 4 more just showed up like this.  |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Joined: 3/7/2014
Posts: 790
     
Points: 1970
        Feedback Rating: 64 Location: Here in the darkBadges:
| kurtb718 - 10/1/2018 3:41 PM
So I realize I'm a new guy on the block here but these points only reviews are basically worthless to a newbie looking to try new cigars.
My 2 cents is that is your going to review you should put at least some effort into it. I see 4 more just showed up like this. 
When I PMed Kyle Stogez about it, he replied "I really don't give a s**t." Maybe an Admin could message him and ask him to update his reviews to be a bit more descriptive, or maybe just ban him.  |
|
|
|
 Expert
Joined: 12/25/2013
Posts: 2334
    
Points: 3564
     Feedback Rating: 87 Badges:
| 4 reviews in 6 minutes is totally legit... |
|
|
|
 Extreme Veteran
Joined: 4/7/2017
Posts: 540
 
Points: 1575
     Feedback Rating: 6 Location: Long Island, NYBadges:
| Those reviews are completely useless lol |
|
|
|
 Extreme Guru
Joined: 3/16/2008
Posts: 8156
     
Points: 47256
              Feedback Rating: 82 Badges:
| "Please note that there is a minimum number of characters required (150) in order to submit a review so that your experience may provide others with some helpful information. A very brief synopsis regarding flavor, construction and burn will suffice, but feel free to be as detailed as you desire."
The above is the requirement. I will PM the member and ask him to meet it. |
|
|
|
 Veteran
Joined: 7/16/2017
Posts: 161
  
Points: 566
   Feedback Rating: 0 Location: Varpalota/Budapest/HungaryBadges:
| what I do not understand is, if someone can give detailed scoring, why he is unable to give the reasoning? I mean if you explain why you gave low score on taste, because it was no taste, or bitter, etc, BAMM.. you are already there to give useful information.... and does not really require too much effort....
Or they are so lazy? |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Joined: 5/30/2018
Posts: 624
 
Points: 839
     Feedback Rating: 1 Location: Louisville KYBadges:
| Speaking as a person relatively new to cigars I like to see a lot of info in the review. It not only helps me as far as selection but also things to be aware of when smoking a cigar. |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Joined: 1/29/2017
Posts: 640
  
Points: 2470
       Feedback Rating: 31 Location: Sort of South and Somewhat West of ChicagoBadges:
| CarlosoftHUN - 10/1/2018 11:51 PM
what I do not understand is, if someone can give detailed scoring, why he is unable to give the reasoning? I mean if you explain why you gave low score on taste, because it was no taste, or bitter, etc, BAMM.. you are already there to give useful information.... and does not really require too much effort....
Or they are so lazy?
It is a points grab to try to get the $25 GC from the monthly points contest.
It is completely against the rules (the 150 word count or better writeup) and really waters down the whole rating system.
It is just disappointing because CG is held in such high regard and this just tarnishes things. |
|
|
|
 Elite Veteran
Joined: 1/29/2017
Posts: 640
  
Points: 2470
       Feedback Rating: 31 Location: Sort of South and Somewhat West of ChicagoBadges:
| bstessl - 10/1/2018 7:22 PM
4 reviews in 6 minutes is totally legit...
He's an amateur anyway. I have seen you review 6 sticks in 4 minutes, smoking them one by one, all while drinking a beer and doing a podcast...and none of them had burn issues. |
|
|
|
 Expert
Joined: 3/3/2012
Posts: 1469
      
Points: 1964
        Feedback Rating: 39 Location: Charleston, SCBadges:
| Deener27 - 10/2/2018 10:04 AM bstessl - 10/1/2018 7:22 PM 4 reviews in 6 minutes is totally legit... He's an amateur anyway. I have seen you review 6 sticks in 4 minutes, smoking them one by one, all while drinking a beer and doing a podcast...and none of them had burn issues.    |
|
|
|
 Veteran
Joined: 12/3/2013
Posts: 239
  
Points: 544
  Feedback Rating: 2 Location: Buffalo, NYBadges:
| How would you all rate my reviews? Any specific info I should include that I've omitted?  |
|
|
|
 Extreme Veteran
Joined: 4/7/2017
Posts: 540
 
Points: 1575
     Feedback Rating: 6 Location: Long Island, NYBadges:
| Sometimes, like today, I am posting my reviews from my weekend smokes and I will often post 2 or 3 in a day. I don't have much access to a computer on the weekends and it's too cumbersome for me to do the reviews on my phone, so I keep my notes and post them when I get in front of my computer. |
|
|
|
 Expert
Joined: 12/25/2013
Posts: 2334
    
Points: 3564
     Feedback Rating: 87 Badges:
| Silverstix - 10/9/2018 12:15 PM Sometimes, like today, I am posting my reviews from my weekend smokes and I will often post 2 or 3 in a day. I don't have much access to a computer on the weekends and it's too cumbersome for me to do the reviews on my phone, so I keep my notes and post them when I get in front of my computer.
Nothing wrong with that. It's just when somebody has a copy and paste review where they change one adjective throughout the review... Lol |
|
|