the interesting conclusion in the decision
'By failing to analyze' whether consumers are in fact misinformed or underinformed as to premium cigar health effects, 'the agency has failed to offer the rational connection between facts and judgment required to pass muster under the arbitrary and capricious standard.'"
basically seemed to say they could not prove that we, as consumers, were not aware of possible health concerns related to cigars. Wow, that is pretty logical thinking.
Also, just FYI, this judge was appointed by Pres. Obama